▲ 263 ▼ Quebec passes secularism law banning street prayers and prayer rooms in universities (www.ctvnews.ca) submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Valnao@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 child) Instead of feel-good measures like this, they should TAX mosques, churches, temples, prayer sheds, whatever. (it feels good to ME, anyway) In USA, religions pay virtually nothing, with many more benefits than any secular charity or non-profit. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) There's a whole slew of non -profit orgs that would feel pain before religious ones were taxed at any reasonable level. This does remove some direct funding, in the public funded orgs won't have to set aside building space for religion. Students will also have access to different/closer/better schooling if the Catholic schools are not allowed to select students based on their religion, which is great and I don't know how they were allowed to do that based on our Charter of freedoms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* i imagine a situation where churches could keep non-profit status as long as they provided some tangible service to the community. homeless feedings and things like that. but there's no universe in which a religious non-profit should get more privileges than a non-religious one permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) There's a whole slew of non -profit orgs that would feel pain before religious ones were taxed at any reasonable level. This does remove some direct funding, in the public funded orgs won't have to set aside building space for religion. Students will also have access to different/closer/better schooling if the Catholic schools are not allowed to select students based on their religion, which is great and I don't know how they were allowed to do that based on our Charter of freedoms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* i imagine a situation where churches could keep non-profit status as long as they provided some tangible service to the community. homeless feedings and things like that. but there's no universe in which a religious non-profit should get more privileges than a non-religious one permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* i imagine a situation where churches could keep non-profit status as long as they provided some tangible service to the community. homeless feedings and things like that. but there's no universe in which a religious non-profit should get more privileges than a non-religious one permalink fedilink source parent