you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)

And I'm sure like french laicite this will be enforced unequally and will discriminate in order to target minorities.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It doesn't need to. I don't think anyone but Muslims is required to pray multiple times a day and need places to do so. It's specifically meant to be an anti-Muslim law.

    Just like making it illegal for anybody to sleep under a bridge. Surely that wasn't aimed at the homeless, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Muslims don't need places to do so (Friday prayer aside), but they have to pray somewhere and they're also forbidding praying in the street.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Defining prayer is difficult, surely?
    Would that be a catch all cause for investigations?

    I figure this will be compared to thought-crime law.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    "The suspect was seen sitting on a park bench with his eyes closed, his head inclined, and his hands clasped in his lap. So you see, your honor, and I submit to the jury, that the suspect was indeed clearly praying in public, and I motion to add a charge of perjury, for lying to this court under oath when he stated 'I was just resting my eyes.'"

  • source
  • parent