you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 180 points 4 months ago (8 children)

This isn't sustainable. Almost all of our infrastructure runs on computers and eventually it will reach a point where you have a computer in charge of vital infrastructure that won't be able to buy replacement part and it'll just fail.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    nah all of the datacenters they build for AI, will come to use then. 

    they will say"Need computing? Don't worry, just rent from us, for an ever increasing and enshittifying subscription"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    We can't even get them to upgrade our infrastructure to the 21st century in some cases so good luck with that. We still got shit running on Windows 7 or even Windows XP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    You can’t interact with a computer in the cloud though without some kind of computer in front of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    We'll just return to terminals. Just a screen, and input devices connected to a server :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Right but surely you still need a CPU and RAM at the very least to process the Remote Desktop connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I bit of ram, but then I'd imagine you only need some purpose built chip for the connection, input and display logic. Effectively you'd need little more than a chrome cast-like device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Chips of any kind are the issue. All the silicon fabs are being diverted to cover these insane datacenter orders. Like they're backordered out over a year at this point. All to boost a tech bubble for a product that doesn't work

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    There‘s existing infrastructure, that runs on hardware from the 1980s. Especially in industrial applications there are still plenty of gigantic machines controlled by a 386 or a C-64.

    The used vintage market can keep these running for a long time. Eventually you replace them with an emulator or an FPGA that runs the same software.

    Big banking, insurance, airlines, shipping, governments, militaries bought huge IBM mainframes from the 1960s onwards. They ran for decades. Many of these were transformed into virtual machines, still running their ancient FORTRAN code.

    There’s also the story of (IIRC Minutemen) nuclear missiles needing 5.25 floppies to program their guidance systems. These were still operational in the early 2000s. Lots of military weapons systems run on ancient hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Banks, insurance, and aviation all run on very well-tested established code, and are very, very resistant to change.

    But people who know cobol and fortran are getting fewer and further between, so they are slowly changing. Fortunately with modern software development practices, you can much more easily write verified software.

  • source
  • parent