▲ 417 ▼ An AI School, With No Teachers, To Open in Chicago This Fall (blockclubchicago.org) submitted 4 months ago by andros_rex@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 263 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] scibra122@piefed.social 49 points 4 months ago (1 child) Is this data in the room with us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -21 points 4 months ago (2 children) https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/10/895 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children) “AI should serve as a scaffold for cognitive construction rather than a substitute.” “...the teacher’s role is shifting from knowledge transmission to instructional design and behavioral facilitation… Teachers must develop digital literacy and data fluency while acting as safeguards against over‑automation, ensuring that human judgment and educational values mediate AI adoption.” “...while AI offers efficiency and feedback advantages, traditional teaching remains essential for tasks requiring cultural interpretation, discourse depth, and emotional connection. A blended model—AI for repetitive or procedural tasks and teachers for critical discourse—appears most effective.” This study explicitly does not advocate for replacing teachers with AI, and repeatedly cautions against doing so permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kurwa@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) You have to excuse them, they used AI to summarize it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Ironically... so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -14 points 4 months ago And the school that is opening will still have human "guides" so I'm curious how it will work out. I agree it should be a mix of AI and human, and not fully AI. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 child) These findings highlight both the promise and the limitations of AI in language education, underscoring the importance of teacher facilitation and thoughtful design of human–AI interaction to support deep and sustainable learning. The problem is there's no teachers in this scenario, at least that's my understanding permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) You're right, they will have "guides" instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won't know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krisevol@lemmus.org -21 points 4 months ago (2 children) https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/10/895 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children) “AI should serve as a scaffold for cognitive construction rather than a substitute.” “...the teacher’s role is shifting from knowledge transmission to instructional design and behavioral facilitation… Teachers must develop digital literacy and data fluency while acting as safeguards against over‑automation, ensuring that human judgment and educational values mediate AI adoption.” “...while AI offers efficiency and feedback advantages, traditional teaching remains essential for tasks requiring cultural interpretation, discourse depth, and emotional connection. A blended model—AI for repetitive or procedural tasks and teachers for critical discourse—appears most effective.” This study explicitly does not advocate for replacing teachers with AI, and repeatedly cautions against doing so permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kurwa@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) You have to excuse them, they used AI to summarize it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Ironically... so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -14 points 4 months ago And the school that is opening will still have human "guides" so I'm curious how it will work out. I agree it should be a mix of AI and human, and not fully AI. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 child) These findings highlight both the promise and the limitations of AI in language education, underscoring the importance of teacher facilitation and thoughtful design of human–AI interaction to support deep and sustainable learning. The problem is there's no teachers in this scenario, at least that's my understanding permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) You're right, they will have "guides" instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won't know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children) “AI should serve as a scaffold for cognitive construction rather than a substitute.” “...the teacher’s role is shifting from knowledge transmission to instructional design and behavioral facilitation… Teachers must develop digital literacy and data fluency while acting as safeguards against over‑automation, ensuring that human judgment and educational values mediate AI adoption.” “...while AI offers efficiency and feedback advantages, traditional teaching remains essential for tasks requiring cultural interpretation, discourse depth, and emotional connection. A blended model—AI for repetitive or procedural tasks and teachers for critical discourse—appears most effective.” This study explicitly does not advocate for replacing teachers with AI, and repeatedly cautions against doing so permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kurwa@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) You have to excuse them, they used AI to summarize it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Ironically... so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -14 points 4 months ago And the school that is opening will still have human "guides" so I'm curious how it will work out. I agree it should be a mix of AI and human, and not fully AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 child) You have to excuse them, they used AI to summarize it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Ironically... so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Ironically... so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krisevol@lemmus.org -14 points 4 months ago And the school that is opening will still have human "guides" so I'm curious how it will work out. I agree it should be a mix of AI and human, and not fully AI. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 child) These findings highlight both the promise and the limitations of AI in language education, underscoring the importance of teacher facilitation and thoughtful design of human–AI interaction to support deep and sustainable learning. The problem is there's no teachers in this scenario, at least that's my understanding permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krisevol@lemmus.org -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) You're right, they will have "guides" instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won't know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krisevol@lemmus.org -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) You're right, they will have "guides" instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won't know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] sheetzoos@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent