▲ 351 ▼ The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux (www.sambent.com) submitted 4 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 359 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (1 child) I agree with you but repeating your arguments in mass replies does not make it stronger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) I don't think that it does, if this were a wikipedia discussion where bad faith arguments and trolling were removed then I'd agree. But since the moderation on this topic doesn't exist, the only thing remaining to Team 'Don't Dox and Harass Developers' is the blunt instrument of repetition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) You are trying to protect the villain in the story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Yes, you're right. This story was written to turn a developer in a villain. You are uncritically accepting the framing and supporting a harassment campaign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 4 months ago Not uncritically at all. I’m just not a collaborator or one to defend collaborators. Zero tolerance for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -6 points 4 months ago (1 child) I don't think that it does, if this were a wikipedia discussion where bad faith arguments and trolling were removed then I'd agree. But since the moderation on this topic doesn't exist, the only thing remaining to Team 'Don't Dox and Harass Developers' is the blunt instrument of repetition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) You are trying to protect the villain in the story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Yes, you're right. This story was written to turn a developer in a villain. You are uncritically accepting the framing and supporting a harassment campaign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 4 months ago Not uncritically at all. I’m just not a collaborator or one to defend collaborators. Zero tolerance for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) You are trying to protect the villain in the story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Yes, you're right. This story was written to turn a developer in a villain. You are uncritically accepting the framing and supporting a harassment campaign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 4 months ago Not uncritically at all. I’m just not a collaborator or one to defend collaborators. Zero tolerance for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Yes, you're right. This story was written to turn a developer in a villain. You are uncritically accepting the framing and supporting a harassment campaign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 4 months ago Not uncritically at all. I’m just not a collaborator or one to defend collaborators. Zero tolerance for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 4 months ago Not uncritically at all. I’m just not a collaborator or one to defend collaborators. Zero tolerance for them. permalink fedilink source parent