you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Europe being on a different continent than Asia always seemed like bullshit. I can forgive the isthmuses, but Eurasia feels like it's a thing to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    But then you run into the issue that the very concept of continent was invented to differentiate Europe and Asia (and Africa).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Eh, words change and sometimes terms outlive their etymology or grow beyond it. We "hang up the phone" but no phone these days is actually hung up. 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That's literally the same thing, we kept the expression even when we know it isn't accurate any more, because we still have the need to express the original meaning.

    If anything, we should split Asia in more subcontinents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Yeah, fair enough.

    Still seems like, with the way that continent is typically defined, Eurasia should be the continent with subcontients of Europe, Asia, India, and the Middle East.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The difference between Europe and Asia should also apply to Asia and India.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    How is India different from Pakistan?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I think both pakistan and India are the subcontinent of India. Wherever the mountains are is the edge of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Pakistanis would fume at your comment lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Well by that logic then Europe ,Asia and Africa are all one continent. Just because someone dug a fucking suez ditch does not make them any less connected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Since continent doesn't have a strict definition, in my book, giving the isthmus of suez (and the isthmus of panama) a pass makes sense. Both of those were historically very difficult to traverse and not viable sustained trade routes compared to just sailing around them. Hell, there's still not a road that links North and South America through the Darian Gap, which is wild to me considering what seems like should be a vital connection point bottleneck.

    I understand "continent" a mercurial word and so people can define Europe and Asia as being different contients, but it does seem like it's the only continental division that doesn't make logical sense to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Well I guess. But there is a bridge across the suez and by a similar kind of logic you could split europe into 2 'continets' because of the donau-main kanal. Same thing as the panama one as far as I am concerned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    I think of it more as if you were to give a pen to an alien child and said "draw a circle around the main landmasses on this planet" they would probably logically draw circles around North America, South America, Eurasia, Africa, Australia, and Antarctica. They wouldn't look at the Ural Mountains or any sort of canal systems, just "these are the main blobs on this world map."

    But that's just the way I think of continents. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I guess. But in my mind still main landmass would encompass anything connected to it. So if you were to look at the earth before we built all those canals there would be like 4 continents. I don't personally think small things like a canal would be enough to actually separate 1 continent into 2. It would have to be quite a bit of distance for that to make sense. Like if the entire canal was the width and depth of the gulf of suez then yes, we have made a new continent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Sometimes things are defined by history, inertia, earlier understandings. There are six continents, because there’s always been six and it would be overly pedantic to find objective criteria with today’s understanding …… unless you want another Pluto controversy.

  • source
  • parent