Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

Worked with playwright in C# .NET today and lol the "AIs" knew shit about it. Constantly mixed C# with JavaScript and Python code together and it was incoherent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Then your input is wrong. I mainly work in .net c# and playwright and I have agents building my e2e tests in playwright with just test cases and test steps. These are custom agents I built myself that have the guardrails in place for the agent to stay in bounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I wasnt building test cases :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The point was that AI can use playwright and write in C# just fine. Tests was an example of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Tests are a great use for AI coding, lately. Six months ago Claude Sonnet was writing tests that always passed without testing anything, that has improved dramatically with Opus 4.5/4.6 - it actually hits the functionality now, not just code coverage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    The agents are getting pretty good at reviewing code, too. You don't have to listen to everything they say, but they do point out a lot of stuff that you pretty much have to admit: yeah, that would be better if I changed it to the suggested revision.

  • source
  • parent