▲ 485 ▼ Systemd preparing to comply with age verification laws (github.com) submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linux@lemmy.ml 276 comments fedilink hide all child comments Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along... Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/ Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.
[–] filister@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (5 children) Why do they need the age after all. What are authorities going to do with it? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 5 months ago (1 child) Control what content you see and add some extra detail to fingerprint you. If they can get this simple age verification done from everyone, it's not going to be hard to add "new requirements" in the future permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Either this or block access to people living in hostile places. Currently it is a parental control with no verification of the thruth. You can put 01/01/01 there, if you want. If it turns into identity verification we will see what we can do. permalink fedilink source parent [+] racoon@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 months ago (1 child) They (politicians) are obsessed with control. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) To my understanding, it's also Meta that is lobbying for this. Basically pushing the responsibility elsewhere to the operating system vendors permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) But how would they know I have been truthful about my age? I mean I am never putting my real age when registering on websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago (1 child) I guess they want this law to fall back on in case an underage individual is presented with mature/inappropriate content. Then they can just say that you lied about your age and that is not their fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent [+] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago It's Meta pushing for this to avoid accountability and fines. https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1rshc1f/i_traced_2_billion_in_nonprofit_grants_and_45/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 5 months ago (1 child) Control what content you see and add some extra detail to fingerprint you. If they can get this simple age verification done from everyone, it's not going to be hard to add "new requirements" in the future permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Either this or block access to people living in hostile places. Currently it is a parental control with no verification of the thruth. You can put 01/01/01 there, if you want. If it turns into identity verification we will see what we can do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago Either this or block access to people living in hostile places. Currently it is a parental control with no verification of the thruth. You can put 01/01/01 there, if you want. If it turns into identity verification we will see what we can do. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] racoon@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 months ago (1 child) They (politicians) are obsessed with control. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) To my understanding, it's also Meta that is lobbying for this. Basically pushing the responsibility elsewhere to the operating system vendors permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) But how would they know I have been truthful about my age? I mean I am never putting my real age when registering on websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago (1 child) I guess they want this law to fall back on in case an underage individual is presented with mature/inappropriate content. Then they can just say that you lied about your age and that is not their fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bskm@feddit.nu 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) To my understanding, it's also Meta that is lobbying for this. Basically pushing the responsibility elsewhere to the operating system vendors permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) But how would they know I have been truthful about my age? I mean I am never putting my real age when registering on websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago (1 child) I guess they want this law to fall back on in case an underage individual is presented with mature/inappropriate content. Then they can just say that you lied about your age and that is not their fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) But how would they know I have been truthful about my age? I mean I am never putting my real age when registering on websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago (1 child) I guess they want this law to fall back on in case an underage individual is presented with mature/inappropriate content. Then they can just say that you lied about your age and that is not their fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bskm@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago (1 child) I guess they want this law to fall back on in case an underage individual is presented with mature/inappropriate content. Then they can just say that you lied about your age and that is not their fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, so pretty much they don't want to be held responsible. And the government is bending over to comply with the tech bros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bskm@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago I'm afraid so.... permalink fedilink source parent
[+] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago It's Meta pushing for this to avoid accountability and fines. https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1rshc1f/i_traced_2_billion_in_nonprofit_grants_and_45/ permalink fedilink source parent