you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Absolutely, the idea that "preemptive" strikes are defensive is Orwellian.
Also how does UK know what target they will hit? Will it be a kindergarten killing innocent children? Will it be a refinery constituting chemical warfare on civilians? There is no plausible reason to believe these strikes are purely defensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The idea that preemptive strikes are defensive is Roman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Imagine the number of attacks the world could "morally" do on USA, if preemptive strikes were considered self defense.
    How many countries even allies has Trump threatened? Panama, Cuba, Denmark/Greenland, Canada. Are some that I remember for sure. Besides actually attacking Venezuela and now Iran.
    All these countries could legally perform strikes against USA by the logic of the current American Government. And then they wonder why so many people hate USA.

  • source
  • parent