755
Anon breaks his chains (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/greentext@lemmy.ml
124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Still doesn't look like anything definitive. Words like may and could are littered throughout the article. It looks like the main evidence was a questionnaire.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    You do know that honest science rarely makes definitive statements, right? It may be a spurious correlation, but the next most likely explanation is that all the men lied about their results in a way that perfectly mimicked the expected results, and they did so without any coordination, and over the course of years. Or it's just a massive coincidence that is only true of those men.

    https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancer

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent