▲ 497 ▼ Tulsa mom pleads guilty to allowing 12-year-old daughter to get pregnant by grown man (www.fox23.com) submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 138 comments fedilink hide all child comments It was one of the most bizarre sex crimes in recent Tulsa history. Now it's over, and both adults involved are headed to prison. The 12-year-old girl showed up a Hillcrest Hospital in midtown Tulsa in July 2021 in labor. The father-to-be apparently expected to walk out with the girl and their new bundle of joy. "They walked in just like any other couple would, excited to deliver their newborn child," Tulsa Police Officer Danny Bean told FOX23 News in 2021. When the child, well below the age of consent, showed up to give birth, doctors immediately called Tulsa Police to report what was happening.
[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) There are literally hundreds of child marriages in the US every year. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which all need to stop unless they fall under Romeo and Juliet laws. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Honestly as unpopular as it is for me to say.., those need to be stopped too.. no one should be getting married as teens when they can't vote or sign a contract legally.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Romeo and Juliet laws are fine for consent purposes, but yeah... They can wait for marriage until they're both adults. Too many weird ways that people can technically get away with selling children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago For consent, yes! But the contract/marriage part.. I think they are more dangerous than good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Shouldn’t be that unpopular, really. Under those laws, a 16 year old can marry an 18 year old no problem. But, if things aren’t so great a year later (and let’s be honest, we all know people who’ve had those marriages), the now 17 year old needs permission from their adult spouse (parents don’t count anymore, since marriage also emancipates them) to retain an attorney or file for divorce. Giving the maximum benefit of doubt here and assuming that Romeo and Juliette laws are an honest attempt not to saddle young lovers with a lifetime offender registration, the marriage component of them should be scrapped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Couldn't agree more!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which all need to stop unless they fall under Romeo and Juliet laws. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Honestly as unpopular as it is for me to say.., those need to be stopped too.. no one should be getting married as teens when they can't vote or sign a contract legally.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Romeo and Juliet laws are fine for consent purposes, but yeah... They can wait for marriage until they're both adults. Too many weird ways that people can technically get away with selling children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago For consent, yes! But the contract/marriage part.. I think they are more dangerous than good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Shouldn’t be that unpopular, really. Under those laws, a 16 year old can marry an 18 year old no problem. But, if things aren’t so great a year later (and let’s be honest, we all know people who’ve had those marriages), the now 17 year old needs permission from their adult spouse (parents don’t count anymore, since marriage also emancipates them) to retain an attorney or file for divorce. Giving the maximum benefit of doubt here and assuming that Romeo and Juliette laws are an honest attempt not to saddle young lovers with a lifetime offender registration, the marriage component of them should be scrapped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Couldn't agree more!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) Honestly as unpopular as it is for me to say.., those need to be stopped too.. no one should be getting married as teens when they can't vote or sign a contract legally.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Romeo and Juliet laws are fine for consent purposes, but yeah... They can wait for marriage until they're both adults. Too many weird ways that people can technically get away with selling children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago For consent, yes! But the contract/marriage part.. I think they are more dangerous than good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Shouldn’t be that unpopular, really. Under those laws, a 16 year old can marry an 18 year old no problem. But, if things aren’t so great a year later (and let’s be honest, we all know people who’ve had those marriages), the now 17 year old needs permission from their adult spouse (parents don’t count anymore, since marriage also emancipates them) to retain an attorney or file for divorce. Giving the maximum benefit of doubt here and assuming that Romeo and Juliette laws are an honest attempt not to saddle young lovers with a lifetime offender registration, the marriage component of them should be scrapped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Couldn't agree more!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Romeo and Juliet laws are fine for consent purposes, but yeah... They can wait for marriage until they're both adults. Too many weird ways that people can technically get away with selling children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago For consent, yes! But the contract/marriage part.. I think they are more dangerous than good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago For consent, yes! But the contract/marriage part.. I think they are more dangerous than good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Shouldn’t be that unpopular, really. Under those laws, a 16 year old can marry an 18 year old no problem. But, if things aren’t so great a year later (and let’s be honest, we all know people who’ve had those marriages), the now 17 year old needs permission from their adult spouse (parents don’t count anymore, since marriage also emancipates them) to retain an attorney or file for divorce. Giving the maximum benefit of doubt here and assuming that Romeo and Juliette laws are an honest attempt not to saddle young lovers with a lifetime offender registration, the marriage component of them should be scrapped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Couldn't agree more!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Couldn't agree more!! permalink fedilink source parent