▲ 605 ▼ Kamala Harris might run for president again in 2028. Please, no | Arwa Mahdawi (www.theguardian.com) submitted 4 months ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world 324 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 32 points 4 months ago (2 children) Because the DNC will try to fuck over any potential progressives with her if she runs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Won't they try and do that with any candidate of their choice? Maybe we should just, I don't know, vote on it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) I guess you forgot what happened to Bernie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago Nope. This is a good example of the DNC always pushing who they want and that's my point. If it's not Harris it will be someone else. People need to vote in the primaries. We're also seeing a shift in who people vote for and voter turnout (see NY and TX). permalink fedilink source parent [–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago This is, unequivocally, the real answer. Ultimately the DNC is the arbiter of candidates and they're never going to allow a candidate that rocks the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Won't they try and do that with any candidate of their choice? Maybe we should just, I don't know, vote on it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) I guess you forgot what happened to Bernie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago Nope. This is a good example of the DNC always pushing who they want and that's my point. If it's not Harris it will be someone else. People need to vote in the primaries. We're also seeing a shift in who people vote for and voter turnout (see NY and TX). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cashsky@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) I guess you forgot what happened to Bernie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago Nope. This is a good example of the DNC always pushing who they want and that's my point. If it's not Harris it will be someone else. People need to vote in the primaries. We're also seeing a shift in who people vote for and voter turnout (see NY and TX). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago Nope. This is a good example of the DNC always pushing who they want and that's my point. If it's not Harris it will be someone else. People need to vote in the primaries. We're also seeing a shift in who people vote for and voter turnout (see NY and TX). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago This is, unequivocally, the real answer. Ultimately the DNC is the arbiter of candidates and they're never going to allow a candidate that rocks the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent