▲ 1102 ▼ A broken clock is still right twice a day. (lemmy.world) submitted 5 months ago by Substance_P@lemmy.world to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world 134 comments fedilink hide all child comments Perhaps she should've thought about that when she was cheerleading the crowd of neocons who are perpetrating all of this.
[–] squidie@feddit.org 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) And no more interest in the Epstein files. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children) How many known Epstein associates have been arrested to date? I keep hearing "Release the Files!" I've yet to see any New York or California prosecutors going after anyone named. Hell, they're still subsidizing the businesses and fetting many of the individuals involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not a lawyer, but unless they have reasonable evidence the crimes occurred on their states, the state prosecutors can't do anything. The DOJ has that evidence, they have been ordered to release it and they refuse. Prosecutors can't ask for underacted files "just in case" That's why people are demanding the files, so people can be arrested. I'm honestly surprised how backwards you got it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) unless they have reasonable evidence "Release The Epstein Files" "Also, this is not useful information for any actionable outcome" :-/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) On their states. Please take the full quote. Last line is yours, not mine. Also false. They can't investigate of they don't even know who's who. That's the whole point. DOJ has the files and the legal obligation to release them with very limited restriction. Somehow they don't feel like doing it. That on itself should be a major scandal, regardless of the contents. But hey, if you think Epstein was condemned for human trafficking but had no associate or customer, you're a special case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aturtlesdream@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Only ones who live outside the USA sadly so far permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children) How many known Epstein associates have been arrested to date? I keep hearing "Release the Files!" I've yet to see any New York or California prosecutors going after anyone named. Hell, they're still subsidizing the businesses and fetting many of the individuals involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not a lawyer, but unless they have reasonable evidence the crimes occurred on their states, the state prosecutors can't do anything. The DOJ has that evidence, they have been ordered to release it and they refuse. Prosecutors can't ask for underacted files "just in case" That's why people are demanding the files, so people can be arrested. I'm honestly surprised how backwards you got it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) unless they have reasonable evidence "Release The Epstein Files" "Also, this is not useful information for any actionable outcome" :-/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) On their states. Please take the full quote. Last line is yours, not mine. Also false. They can't investigate of they don't even know who's who. That's the whole point. DOJ has the files and the legal obligation to release them with very limited restriction. Somehow they don't feel like doing it. That on itself should be a major scandal, regardless of the contents. But hey, if you think Epstein was condemned for human trafficking but had no associate or customer, you're a special case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aturtlesdream@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Only ones who live outside the USA sadly so far permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not a lawyer, but unless they have reasonable evidence the crimes occurred on their states, the state prosecutors can't do anything. The DOJ has that evidence, they have been ordered to release it and they refuse. Prosecutors can't ask for underacted files "just in case" That's why people are demanding the files, so people can be arrested. I'm honestly surprised how backwards you got it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) unless they have reasonable evidence "Release The Epstein Files" "Also, this is not useful information for any actionable outcome" :-/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) On their states. Please take the full quote. Last line is yours, not mine. Also false. They can't investigate of they don't even know who's who. That's the whole point. DOJ has the files and the legal obligation to release them with very limited restriction. Somehow they don't feel like doing it. That on itself should be a major scandal, regardless of the contents. But hey, if you think Epstein was condemned for human trafficking but had no associate or customer, you're a special case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) unless they have reasonable evidence "Release The Epstein Files" "Also, this is not useful information for any actionable outcome" :-/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) On their states. Please take the full quote. Last line is yours, not mine. Also false. They can't investigate of they don't even know who's who. That's the whole point. DOJ has the files and the legal obligation to release them with very limited restriction. Somehow they don't feel like doing it. That on itself should be a major scandal, regardless of the contents. But hey, if you think Epstein was condemned for human trafficking but had no associate or customer, you're a special case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) On their states. Please take the full quote. Last line is yours, not mine. Also false. They can't investigate of they don't even know who's who. That's the whole point. DOJ has the files and the legal obligation to release them with very limited restriction. Somehow they don't feel like doing it. That on itself should be a major scandal, regardless of the contents. But hey, if you think Epstein was condemned for human trafficking but had no associate or customer, you're a special case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago They can’t investigate of they don’t even know who’s who. There's a laundry list of suspects. Ffs, the Brits didn't have a problem going after Mandelson. Even (ex-)Prince Charles. Nobody in the US is doing anything because nobody wants to do anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aturtlesdream@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Only ones who live outside the USA sadly so far permalink fedilink source parent