you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

Because they were originally successful companies that weren't owned by meta, and meta couldn't have that so they bought them.

Why this doesn't violate anti-trust laws is anybody's guess...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments