2072
"Cancel ChatGPT" movement goes mainstream after OpenAI closes deal with U.S. Department of War — as Anthropic refuses to surveil American citizens (www.windowscentral.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
234 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Anyone stockpiling ai prompt vulnerabilities for when we'll eventually need them to fight off some deathbots?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    This is a nonsensical and unrealistic fear/threat to be putting at the top of your list.

    The biggest problems are happening right now not in some 90s sci fi films.

    One of those threats is automated weaponry and mass surveillance, but not in the comic relief way you speak about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Prey tell the purpose of your comment, Brutus

    You take issue with referring to these machines as deathbots? I'm allowed to poke fun at things that will eventually be used to attempt murdering me you absolute anthropomorphic dunce cap.

    I wasn't referring to some far off scenario, more for when this situation happens

    I can assure you that not only do I live somewhere where these very things are above me daily, that I'm out here working my ass off in unspeakable ways to prevent exactly the aforementioned sceneario for people like yourself

    Direct your anger elsewhere, the energy could be spent doing something useful

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    It's a trope that every problem posed by the plot has a solution of difficulty level properly fit to the audience.

    A culture of arcade games, unfortunately, has such long-standing effects.

    While we are playing a roguelike. With no respawns.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    A machine is more expensive and less expendable than a human. You don’t need to worry about killbots.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry, but this is a stupid take. Humans can refuse to fire on a crowd of innocent people. Killbots cannot. The unquestioning loyalty is worth more than money can buy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    The Nazis’ biggest problem was finding willing participants.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    The reason why shooting people was too difficult is because many of the einsatzgruppen members broke down psychological and some became so murderous that they might not have been fit to reenter civilian society. They used gas chambers because it was sufficiently distanced from the actual act of killing (it just involved rounding people up into a room and having some guy with a canister dump the stuff into a vent. None of the actual killers even had to see the results of their actions as the cleaning was done by another group) that they could do it without creating that same problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent