you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

Thats cute, fatcrab.

So if “goy” (supremacist word) is just fine, then “taliban” (aka 'seeker of knowledge') is fine. Be consistent, FatCrab. Language is an agreement on a meaning, and for people to adopt your preferred pet meaning of a word, it has to be a logical, ethical, even handed use of the word. Or, you could just accept that words have conotations. Theres a reason the N word is hateful, as an equivalent example.

While we’re at it, I dont like your term “Islamofascist”.. seems like tying fascism to what billions of people beleive as a religion. But hey, I’ll allow it, if you allow us to start using “judeofascist”, or even better, “judeo-nazi”. Which do you prefer? Although we already have "zionist" which captures all that already. But native intuits have 10 words for snow, so zionists having many words for fascism is legit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    I would say using judeosupremacist or judeofascist is a fine way to describe Zionism. After all, yiddish newspapers in the 20s often compared it to "Hitlerism". But that is unrelated to the fact that "goy" is itself a completely neutral word simply denoting non-Jewish. You trying to turn a common and mundane word into a secret word to mean some sort of Zionism is not just fucking stupid, it's dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    using the word "islamofascist" is also dangerous. Didnt stop you using it though. Maybe heed your own advice. I'm not muslim but I dont like to see that BS. And just because you personally feel "goy" is completely neutral doesnt mean it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments