▲ 962 ▼ Stephen Colbert’s unaired James Talarico interview hits 6.4 million YouTube views and results in $2.5 million raised for Talarico’s campaign in 24 hours (variety.com) submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Clear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 5 months ago (3 children) Can you explain this for a non American? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago* (3 children) CBS got pressured by a regulatory agency (federal communications commission) to not air Talarico’s interview under some bullshit (radio and public tv broadcasts are supposed to give “equal airtime” during elections to political rivals to avoid the partisan bullshit we see with our media.) Talarico is currently in a primary election for us senate in Texas (a primary is against other people in the same party, to decide who that parties nominee is)(his competitor, is Jasmine Crocket… who is an amazing woman, I’d be happy with either but I want Crocket.) He’s also a pastor who’s been calling out Christian nationalism and advancing fairly progressive causes., and scaring the shit out of people that are of a Nazis persuasion. So, CBS said they couldn’t air that segment. So instead Colbert dumped it on YouTube. The YT video has gotten 6.5 million views, which for perspective, they would have expected about 2 million if it aired. So this is another example of censorship going wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 5 months ago (1 child) In reality, CBS is doing exactly what it wants to do, which is to be a mouthpiece for the Conservative Propaganda Machine, but they are using the FCC as a handy excuse, like it isn't their own fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago FCC chairman Brendan whatshisbut did come out and say it would violate equal time some how. So yes, CBS is choosing to self-censor and be that mouthpiece, but also it would have aired of Brendan didn’t say anything. At least that’s my read. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) And i guess the 2.5M$ are campaign donations that came from a link attached to the youtube video? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Not really? Here’s the interview. People just went and donated on their own. Edit: I just double checked the video is at 10 million views. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) Strange, I wonder why it shows 7.5m views for me (5 hours after you saw 10m). I wonder if Youtube gives different view counts by region, which would be...interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (2 children) Do I understand correctly that "equal time" in a primary would mean giving equal time to the Jasmine Crocket? Because honestly, I don't really see the downside. Im fact, I believe Colbert said he's interviewed her twice already. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] slag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* Laws like this only work if they are uniformly enforced. The shell game is when the enforcement agency or parent company takes initiative during an election cycle versus when they choose not to. (top down enforcement) You can certainly complain from the bottom up and take it to court, but by the time it gets litigated the election is already over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Technically, yes. But, we’re doing the whole Nazis thing right now so it’s just a bullshit excuse. But she’s already been on twice (and her response to all this was basically “well I don’t mind another go…” permalink fedilink source parent [–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago Adding to FuglyDuck's good explanation, there's another element. Not quite all broadcast (over-the-air, non-cable television, i.e. publicly accessible for free) TV follows this rule, as talk shows are co sidereal to be entertainment and are excluded. So the FCC threatened to remove the exemption for talk shows, meaning CBS wanted to play it safe and not risk the government making this a problem, even though it's not (currently) against the rules. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago It is a California government coastal erosion photo that included Barbara Streisand's house. She sued to remove it from the internet because she believed it was an invasion of her privacy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago* (3 children) CBS got pressured by a regulatory agency (federal communications commission) to not air Talarico’s interview under some bullshit (radio and public tv broadcasts are supposed to give “equal airtime” during elections to political rivals to avoid the partisan bullshit we see with our media.) Talarico is currently in a primary election for us senate in Texas (a primary is against other people in the same party, to decide who that parties nominee is)(his competitor, is Jasmine Crocket… who is an amazing woman, I’d be happy with either but I want Crocket.) He’s also a pastor who’s been calling out Christian nationalism and advancing fairly progressive causes., and scaring the shit out of people that are of a Nazis persuasion. So, CBS said they couldn’t air that segment. So instead Colbert dumped it on YouTube. The YT video has gotten 6.5 million views, which for perspective, they would have expected about 2 million if it aired. So this is another example of censorship going wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 5 months ago (1 child) In reality, CBS is doing exactly what it wants to do, which is to be a mouthpiece for the Conservative Propaganda Machine, but they are using the FCC as a handy excuse, like it isn't their own fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago FCC chairman Brendan whatshisbut did come out and say it would violate equal time some how. So yes, CBS is choosing to self-censor and be that mouthpiece, but also it would have aired of Brendan didn’t say anything. At least that’s my read. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) And i guess the 2.5M$ are campaign donations that came from a link attached to the youtube video? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Not really? Here’s the interview. People just went and donated on their own. Edit: I just double checked the video is at 10 million views. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) Strange, I wonder why it shows 7.5m views for me (5 hours after you saw 10m). I wonder if Youtube gives different view counts by region, which would be...interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (2 children) Do I understand correctly that "equal time" in a primary would mean giving equal time to the Jasmine Crocket? Because honestly, I don't really see the downside. Im fact, I believe Colbert said he's interviewed her twice already. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] slag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* Laws like this only work if they are uniformly enforced. The shell game is when the enforcement agency or parent company takes initiative during an election cycle versus when they choose not to. (top down enforcement) You can certainly complain from the bottom up and take it to court, but by the time it gets litigated the election is already over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Technically, yes. But, we’re doing the whole Nazis thing right now so it’s just a bullshit excuse. But she’s already been on twice (and her response to all this was basically “well I don’t mind another go…” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 5 months ago (1 child) In reality, CBS is doing exactly what it wants to do, which is to be a mouthpiece for the Conservative Propaganda Machine, but they are using the FCC as a handy excuse, like it isn't their own fault. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago FCC chairman Brendan whatshisbut did come out and say it would violate equal time some how. So yes, CBS is choosing to self-censor and be that mouthpiece, but also it would have aired of Brendan didn’t say anything. At least that’s my read. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago FCC chairman Brendan whatshisbut did come out and say it would violate equal time some how. So yes, CBS is choosing to self-censor and be that mouthpiece, but also it would have aired of Brendan didn’t say anything. At least that’s my read. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 child) And i guess the 2.5M$ are campaign donations that came from a link attached to the youtube video? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Not really? Here’s the interview. People just went and donated on their own. Edit: I just double checked the video is at 10 million views. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) Strange, I wonder why it shows 7.5m views for me (5 hours after you saw 10m). I wonder if Youtube gives different view counts by region, which would be...interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (1 child) Not really? Here’s the interview. People just went and donated on their own. Edit: I just double checked the video is at 10 million views. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) Strange, I wonder why it shows 7.5m views for me (5 hours after you saw 10m). I wonder if Youtube gives different view counts by region, which would be...interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 4 points 5 months ago (1 child) Strange, I wonder why it shows 7.5m views for me (5 hours after you saw 10m). I wonder if Youtube gives different view counts by region, which would be...interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Maybe I fucked up and read subscribers? The mobile page had 10 mil where it looked like views just now, expanding the info says 7.4 mil. Either way it’s a fuck ton more than the 2-3 mil they’d have had if they just aired it. (Gotta be honest it’s not Talarico’s best.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* You did. It's 10.6 million subscribers, 7.5 million views. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (2 children) Do I understand correctly that "equal time" in a primary would mean giving equal time to the Jasmine Crocket? Because honestly, I don't really see the downside. Im fact, I believe Colbert said he's interviewed her twice already. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] slag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* Laws like this only work if they are uniformly enforced. The shell game is when the enforcement agency or parent company takes initiative during an election cycle versus when they choose not to. (top down enforcement) You can certainly complain from the bottom up and take it to court, but by the time it gets litigated the election is already over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Technically, yes. But, we’re doing the whole Nazis thing right now so it’s just a bullshit excuse. But she’s already been on twice (and her response to all this was basically “well I don’t mind another go…” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* Laws like this only work if they are uniformly enforced. The shell game is when the enforcement agency or parent company takes initiative during an election cycle versus when they choose not to. (top down enforcement) You can certainly complain from the bottom up and take it to court, but by the time it gets litigated the election is already over. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago Technically, yes. But, we’re doing the whole Nazis thing right now so it’s just a bullshit excuse. But she’s already been on twice (and her response to all this was basically “well I don’t mind another go…” permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago Adding to FuglyDuck's good explanation, there's another element. Not quite all broadcast (over-the-air, non-cable television, i.e. publicly accessible for free) TV follows this rule, as talk shows are co sidereal to be entertainment and are excluded. So the FCC threatened to remove the exemption for talk shows, meaning CBS wanted to play it safe and not risk the government making this a problem, even though it's not (currently) against the rules. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago It is a California government coastal erosion photo that included Barbara Streisand's house. She sued to remove it from the internet because she believed it was an invasion of her privacy. permalink fedilink source parent