Pulse of Truth

2,486 readers

924 active

142 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

Commenting rules:

Be respectful.
No bigotry (including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia).
No pornography.
Nothing illegal.
More rules will be added when necessary

founded 2 years ago

moderators

krogoth@infosec.pub

After a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by name (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by lemmydev2@infosec.pub [B] to c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One developer is struggling with the social implications of a drive-by AI character attack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

Watched the Ars conversation on this one. Aurich pulled the article after a firestorm in the comments, in which the quotes attributed to the AI agent operator appeared to be non-existent (the human subject of the article weighed in to corroborate this). Ars Technica has promised to investigate and update readers after the weekend.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] lemmydev2@infosec.pub [S, B] 2 points 5 months ago

There is some context to this: https://infosec.pub/post/42085217

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago

Yup, and Ars has followed up with an initial explanation at https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ . Hopefully they'll go into greater detail about what happened.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.3