▲ 1515 ▼ Regarding the “Rust” shooting. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by SomeoneElse@lemmy.world [M] to c/dontyouknowwhoiam@lemmy.world 271 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] beetus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) "Yeah he blew off this years mandatory training, but he showed up to last years training, it can't be his fault!". Idk that doesn't really seem like a valid excuse permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 years ago (1 child) We're talking manslaughter charges here, Baldwin's lawyer doesn't have to prove he's not at fault, the prosecution has to prove without a reasonable doubt that he is at fault. Very different things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bric@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) He has both criminal and civil charges being brought against him though, and the civil charges have a much lower standard. He might not be charged with manslaughter, but still be liable as the one at fault permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago Yeah for sure, but I mean the context of this conversation is him being actually charged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 years ago (1 child) We're talking manslaughter charges here, Baldwin's lawyer doesn't have to prove he's not at fault, the prosecution has to prove without a reasonable doubt that he is at fault. Very different things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bric@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) He has both criminal and civil charges being brought against him though, and the civil charges have a much lower standard. He might not be charged with manslaughter, but still be liable as the one at fault permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago Yeah for sure, but I mean the context of this conversation is him being actually charged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bric@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) He has both criminal and civil charges being brought against him though, and the civil charges have a much lower standard. He might not be charged with manslaughter, but still be liable as the one at fault permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago Yeah for sure, but I mean the context of this conversation is him being actually charged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago Yeah for sure, but I mean the context of this conversation is him being actually charged. permalink fedilink source parent
