▲ 170 ▼ AI Didn't Break Copyright Law, It Just Exposed How Broken It Already Was (jasonwillems.com) submitted 6 months ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (2 children) ... murder is also illegal? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago Not for certain people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tweet@feddit.uk 1 point 6 months ago So you're an author and the only thing between a billion dollar studio and a royalty-free production of your work (that you have no creative input into) is your own death. And you'd feel fine and safe with that because "murder is illegal"? It's hard to get away unnoticed with producing a work that infringes copyright, since they tend to have to be released to the public, and from a known source. Getting away with murder is a cinch in comparison. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago Not for certain people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tweet@feddit.uk 1 point 6 months ago So you're an author and the only thing between a billion dollar studio and a royalty-free production of your work (that you have no creative input into) is your own death. And you'd feel fine and safe with that because "murder is illegal"? It's hard to get away unnoticed with producing a work that infringes copyright, since they tend to have to be released to the public, and from a known source. Getting away with murder is a cinch in comparison. permalink fedilink source parent