▲ 188 ▼ Ex-CNN anchor Don Lemon released after arrest over Minnesota church protest (www.theguardian.com) submitted 6 months ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago (1 child) Just to be clear. He is still being charged, they arraignment judge just set the bail to $0. . permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children) So what he is being charged for? I mean what law did he brokebreak? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 child) They are charging him under two laws and well outside the intent of both. The first is what is informally called the Klan Act, a law enacted to protect black churches during reconstruction when they were targeted by the KKK. The second is called the FACE act, a law from the 90s that was intended to protect abortion clinics but in a compromise with conservatives protects churches as well - notably this law requires violence to have been inflicted so I have no idea how they justify using it, the original magistrate judge crossed it out on the warrants for the 3 protesters he agreed to charge. This is all transparently vindictive prosecution of journalists who are unfriendly towards the administration. The protesters themselves should only be charged with trespassing or disturbing the peace at most, but the DoJ is entirely compromised into a weapon against the American people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago I'm sure both of these charges are about trying to troll Blacks and the left, too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jandro@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago From the linked article: The justice department charged Lemon and three others with civil rights crimes, saying they interfered with the exercise of religious freedom at a place of worship and conspired to do so. permalink fedilink source parent [–] huquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago Eating a meal. A succulent Chinese meal permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (*break) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children) So what he is being charged for? I mean what law did he brokebreak? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TipRing@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 child) They are charging him under two laws and well outside the intent of both. The first is what is informally called the Klan Act, a law enacted to protect black churches during reconstruction when they were targeted by the KKK. The second is called the FACE act, a law from the 90s that was intended to protect abortion clinics but in a compromise with conservatives protects churches as well - notably this law requires violence to have been inflicted so I have no idea how they justify using it, the original magistrate judge crossed it out on the warrants for the 3 protesters he agreed to charge. This is all transparently vindictive prosecution of journalists who are unfriendly towards the administration. The protesters themselves should only be charged with trespassing or disturbing the peace at most, but the DoJ is entirely compromised into a weapon against the American people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago I'm sure both of these charges are about trying to troll Blacks and the left, too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jandro@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago From the linked article: The justice department charged Lemon and three others with civil rights crimes, saying they interfered with the exercise of religious freedom at a place of worship and conspired to do so. permalink fedilink source parent [–] huquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago Eating a meal. A succulent Chinese meal permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (*break) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 child) They are charging him under two laws and well outside the intent of both. The first is what is informally called the Klan Act, a law enacted to protect black churches during reconstruction when they were targeted by the KKK. The second is called the FACE act, a law from the 90s that was intended to protect abortion clinics but in a compromise with conservatives protects churches as well - notably this law requires violence to have been inflicted so I have no idea how they justify using it, the original magistrate judge crossed it out on the warrants for the 3 protesters he agreed to charge. This is all transparently vindictive prosecution of journalists who are unfriendly towards the administration. The protesters themselves should only be charged with trespassing or disturbing the peace at most, but the DoJ is entirely compromised into a weapon against the American people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago I'm sure both of these charges are about trying to troll Blacks and the left, too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago I'm sure both of these charges are about trying to troll Blacks and the left, too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jandro@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago From the linked article: The justice department charged Lemon and three others with civil rights crimes, saying they interfered with the exercise of religious freedom at a place of worship and conspired to do so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago Eating a meal. A succulent Chinese meal permalink fedilink source parent