you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Even that is just a one time boost. If the automation is done there is nothing to be done better. So to grow further people have to be fired or other sources of revenue have to be unlocked.
I still think, sustained growth is impossible in the long run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    I still think, sustained growth is impossible in the long run.

    Oh yeah, for sure. All production consumes natural resources at some point in the chain, even services. And natural resources are finite. Even if we recycle everything, we'd still have a finite amount we have to work with beyond which we can't expand. If the driving force behind the production expansion is primarily profit growth, then there's no satisfying that. That's an inherent problem with the capitalist system. If however the driving force is the need for making something that doesn't exist - e.g. more tanks, more wind turbines, more scientific researchers, more musicians, then automation can help a lot. But even for purely profit-driven growth, automation would provide a lot more runway than making people work more hours. I know you're not disagreeing, I'm just saying this for completeness. :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments