Nato chief says continent cannot afford to replace American security umbrella

WTF Mark!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 6 months ago (1 child)

He chose to take the role of the Trump Appeaser. That's fine with me.

But it also means I couldn't care less about what he's talking when it comes to steps to European independence.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    He has been prime minister for long enough to know exactly how little the European leaders will care about his Trump appeasements.

    I still think that Rutte is the perfect guy for this role, now that we have to deal with Trump. Able to change position while shrugging of any hypocrasy, as slimy as your steriotypical politician, and plenty of experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Vlad Vexler read a quote recently from the Jens Stoltenberg book (I haven't read it yet) on a NATO meeting during Trump's first term. The US delegation was ready to leave, and Rutte managed to make Trump stay, by praising Trump to the skies. This really put him in the position to become Sec Gen. And I agree - he is perfect for the role of Sec Gen during the current Trump era, for his position of keeping NATO alive.

    I think most people see Rutte as a bad Sec Gen, due to him "letting" Trump do and say whatever, and help destroy the current international order. But his job is not to keep the international order alive, its to keep NATO alive. Whether NATO will survive a change to the international order is a different question though.

  • source
  • parent