▲ 981 ▼ Live: Man shot by federal agent in south Minneapolis this morning, witnesses say (www.startribune.com) submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world 243 comments fedilink hide all child comments Gift link, with URL shortener so that Lemmy doesn't remove the gift token Additional reporting from Bring Me The News. They have removed the following text from their coverage: Federal agents briefly detained our reporter at the scene, who says he was tackled to the ground and had a gun put in his face. New York Times
[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) You do though, because one the authorities start spinning their lies, there will be an element of doubt in everyone who has not seen this video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) An element of doubt? I can think critically. Can you not? The default thought hasn't been 'trust the authories' for quite a while now. Rather the opposite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) If you hear two conflicting stories, without witnessing for yourself, there will always be an element of doubt. I'm not saying trust the authoritys, and I don't know where you got that from. I'm saying you shouldn't blindly believe what anyone says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago I got it from the comment you wrote. because one the authorities start spinning their lies I haven't suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn't necessary for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) An element of doubt? I can think critically. Can you not? The default thought hasn't been 'trust the authories' for quite a while now. Rather the opposite. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) If you hear two conflicting stories, without witnessing for yourself, there will always be an element of doubt. I'm not saying trust the authoritys, and I don't know where you got that from. I'm saying you shouldn't blindly believe what anyone says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago I got it from the comment you wrote. because one the authorities start spinning their lies I haven't suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn't necessary for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) If you hear two conflicting stories, without witnessing for yourself, there will always be an element of doubt. I'm not saying trust the authoritys, and I don't know where you got that from. I'm saying you shouldn't blindly believe what anyone says. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago I got it from the comment you wrote. because one the authorities start spinning their lies I haven't suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn't necessary for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago I got it from the comment you wrote. because one the authorities start spinning their lies I haven't suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn't necessary for everyone. permalink fedilink source parent