▲ 822 ▼ ICE says its officers can forcibly enter homes during immigration operations without judicial warrants: 2025 memo (www.nbcnews.com) submitted 6 months ago by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 193 comments fedilink hide all child comments Turns out all you need is a Supreme Court majority on your side and you can wipe your ass with the Constitution.
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 42 points 6 months ago (1 child) Oh this is gonna be fun when it runs up against castle doctrine permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 56 points 6 months ago (3 children) Not really. Remember Wilhoit's Law: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” When they do it, its castle doctrine and qualified immunity and civil rights. When anyone else does it its terrorism. Your comment makes me think you haven't fully digested the situation and still think the US is a nation of laws. If so, you are gravely mistaken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago (1 child) There's no justice under the Robert's court. There wasn't any before the Robert's court, but there isn't any now either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago Yes. It's not binary, but a scale that keeps sliding further and further down the savagery of an uncivilized shithole. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fodor@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) You misunderstand. People will enforce the Castle Doctrine long before this gets to SCOTUS. They already are, actually. I watched a video yesterday of a guy who said what he would do with his Second Amendment if ICE kicked in the door, and of course they ran away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) This is what the bootlickers in this thread seem to be missing… the first time it happens, all the rest of the ICE cosplay pussies are going to think twice before they create the circumstances for it to happen again. Death doesn't care about what the court says a year later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Absolutely loving the Black Panther's approach! Stay strong out there. ✊🏿 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago Castle Doctrine the personal principle, yes. Castle doctrine the law that is upheld in court when unidentified masked men without a warrant bust into someone's home, get shot in the face and the courts respect the law as written even when it turns out after the fact it was ICE? Well, I'll believe it when I see it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago That goes out the window when feds are attacking cops... which has already started permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 56 points 6 months ago (3 children) Not really. Remember Wilhoit's Law: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” When they do it, its castle doctrine and qualified immunity and civil rights. When anyone else does it its terrorism. Your comment makes me think you haven't fully digested the situation and still think the US is a nation of laws. If so, you are gravely mistaken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago (1 child) There's no justice under the Robert's court. There wasn't any before the Robert's court, but there isn't any now either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago Yes. It's not binary, but a scale that keeps sliding further and further down the savagery of an uncivilized shithole. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fodor@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) You misunderstand. People will enforce the Castle Doctrine long before this gets to SCOTUS. They already are, actually. I watched a video yesterday of a guy who said what he would do with his Second Amendment if ICE kicked in the door, and of course they ran away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) This is what the bootlickers in this thread seem to be missing… the first time it happens, all the rest of the ICE cosplay pussies are going to think twice before they create the circumstances for it to happen again. Death doesn't care about what the court says a year later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Absolutely loving the Black Panther's approach! Stay strong out there. ✊🏿 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago Castle Doctrine the personal principle, yes. Castle doctrine the law that is upheld in court when unidentified masked men without a warrant bust into someone's home, get shot in the face and the courts respect the law as written even when it turns out after the fact it was ICE? Well, I'll believe it when I see it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago That goes out the window when feds are attacking cops... which has already started permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago (1 child) There's no justice under the Robert's court. There wasn't any before the Robert's court, but there isn't any now either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago Yes. It's not binary, but a scale that keeps sliding further and further down the savagery of an uncivilized shithole. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago Yes. It's not binary, but a scale that keeps sliding further and further down the savagery of an uncivilized shithole. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) You misunderstand. People will enforce the Castle Doctrine long before this gets to SCOTUS. They already are, actually. I watched a video yesterday of a guy who said what he would do with his Second Amendment if ICE kicked in the door, and of course they ran away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) This is what the bootlickers in this thread seem to be missing… the first time it happens, all the rest of the ICE cosplay pussies are going to think twice before they create the circumstances for it to happen again. Death doesn't care about what the court says a year later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Absolutely loving the Black Panther's approach! Stay strong out there. ✊🏿 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago Castle Doctrine the personal principle, yes. Castle doctrine the law that is upheld in court when unidentified masked men without a warrant bust into someone's home, get shot in the face and the courts respect the law as written even when it turns out after the fact it was ICE? Well, I'll believe it when I see it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 child) This is what the bootlickers in this thread seem to be missing… the first time it happens, all the rest of the ICE cosplay pussies are going to think twice before they create the circumstances for it to happen again. Death doesn't care about what the court says a year later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Absolutely loving the Black Panther's approach! Stay strong out there. ✊🏿 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Absolutely loving the Black Panther's approach! Stay strong out there. ✊🏿 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago 🎶🎵 Safelite repair, Safelite replace 🎵🎶 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago Castle Doctrine the personal principle, yes. Castle doctrine the law that is upheld in court when unidentified masked men without a warrant bust into someone's home, get shot in the face and the courts respect the law as written even when it turns out after the fact it was ICE? Well, I'll believe it when I see it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago That goes out the window when feds are attacking cops... which has already started permalink fedilink source parent