"The Secret Service came to my door today because of a tweet. No threats. No violence. Just words. That’s where we are now," she wrote on X in a thread about the ordeal.

She was asked about the comments she made online, and she made it clear, "I want to see their trials."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    On one hand I feel a bit for this guy. He knows it's bullshit as much as she does. But on the other hand, he's still doing it for the pay check so fuck him. It's gotta be degrading. But it's amazing what people will ignore to maintain an appearance of stability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Making worthless widgets for corporate overlords for a paycheck? Sure, I sympathize. Taking other's livelihoods, safety, and comfort so you can have your own? Nope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The problem is. When it comes to authoritarian states of any flavor, capitalist or otherwise. It all starts to become the same thing. Where were the resources for the widgets unfairly extracted from. And how exploited are the ones making them. But absolutely yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Yep. Was it Marx — "There is no ethical consumption under capitalism"?

    Tangent but maybe not actually Marx:

    The phrase has been around in political circles and on the internet for decades, and it doesn’t appear to have a single originator. It is widely believed to be an amalgamation of ideas from Karl Marx, simmered down into a phrase that people can easily remember.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes, probably just a bad choice of words on my part. More that I think we can identify with going through any bullshit motions just to satisfy some body somewhere, just to get by. But just not as a tool of the state to threaten citizens wellbeing. Fuck that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    You and me both. Though I will say this. Those leaving, especially the attorneys won't be replaced so easily. Fighting from the inside still often entails carrying out the violence of the state. But if they could organize mass resignations as a show of solidarity. It would definitely do more good than a slow rotting. But not being a part of it is still good.

  • source
  • parent