I am currently using Linux Mint (after a long stint of using MX Linux) after learning it handles Nvidia graphics cards flawlessly, which I am grateful for. Whatever grief I have given Ubuntu in the past, I take it back because when they make something work, it is solid.

Anyways, like most distros these days, Flatpaks show up alongside native packages in the package manager / app store. I used to have a bias towards getting the natively packed version, but these days, I am choosing Flatpaks, precisely because I know they will be the latest version.

This includes Blender, Cura, Prusaslicer, and just now QBittorrent. I know this is probably dumb, but I choose the version based on which has the nicer icon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

I am totally ignorant, do flatpaks use a lot more processing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I am glad that the startup times have improved, that bodes well for future startup times. Using up more storage really is what makes it suck for everyone. I thought that it was more efficient, since I see a lot of .platform, and I assumed those are libraries shared across flatpak apps that use those dependencies.

    I am almost sure AppImage has the same problem? I don't know, people do rated that better though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments