87
Grok can't apologize. Grok isn't sentient. So why do headlines keep saying it did? (www.readtpa.com)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
NSFW 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

archive link

content warning: besides the discussion of CSAM, the article contains an example of a Grok-generated image of a child in a bikini. at least it was consensually generated, by the subject of the photo, I guess?

Samantha Smith, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, tested whether Grok would alter a childhood photo of her. It did. “I thought ‘surely this can’t be real,’” she wrote on X. “So I tested it with a photo from my First Holy Communion. It’s real. And it’s fucking sick.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

My point is that xai is making the case for AI regulation for us.

Ha, regulation? With what governing body? Congress is hopeless, because apathy has griped a majority of the voting public, and there's still a large portion of morons who thought MAGA was a good idea.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •