▲ 26 ▼ MXLinux 23 (www.theregister.com) submitted 3 years ago by ManyRoads@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.ml 4 comments fedilink hide all child comments "Middleweight champ MX Linux 23 delivers knockout punch... Debian 12-based version should be your first choice for a non-systemd distro" https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/03/mx_linux_23/?td=rt-3a #Technology #Distro #MXlinux #Debian #Systemd #Linux
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 years ago (3 children) The systemd hate is overblown in my opinion. I've never had much of a problem with it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Sh1nyM3t4l4ss@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Same. I don't care if it "doesn't follow the UNIX philosophy" or whatever, it gets the job done, is IMHO easy to work with and many guides assume that you have it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ManyRoads@lemmy.sdf.org [S] 4 points 3 years ago I, also, use systemd.... When running Wayland and x11 window managers there are quite a few dependencies on systemd that are easiest ti handle by just using it. ;) permalink fedilink source parent [–] multicolorKnight@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago You can, BTW, enable systemd on MX, no problems. I do. It's a good distro besides that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sh1nyM3t4l4ss@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Same. I don't care if it "doesn't follow the UNIX philosophy" or whatever, it gets the job done, is IMHO easy to work with and many guides assume that you have it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ManyRoads@lemmy.sdf.org [S] 4 points 3 years ago I, also, use systemd.... When running Wayland and x11 window managers there are quite a few dependencies on systemd that are easiest ti handle by just using it. ;) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] multicolorKnight@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago You can, BTW, enable systemd on MX, no problems. I do. It's a good distro besides that. permalink fedilink source parent