A talk from the hacker conference 39C3 on how AI generated content was identified via a simple ISBN checksum calculator (in English).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You could just verify all ISBNs are valid on each edit, which would have some value in finding typos, but not doing that leaves this honeypot that could be used to identify AI slop accounts. Clever. Though maybe they’re wise to it now.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    He also points out that there are many ISBNs that are "wrong", but are actually correct in the real world. This is because publishers don't always understand about the checksum and just increment the ISBN when publishing a new book. In many library systems there is this checkbox next to the ISBN entry field where you can say something like "I understand this ISBN is wrong, but it is correct in the real world".

    So just flagging wrong ISBNs would lead to a lot of false positives and would need specific structures to deal with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments