hey had to check and then released him
No they didn't.
They did check, thought it was real, and release him...
But that's not always what happens, and still isn't "due process", which at this point I'm sure you don't know what it actually means.
but if people that had “due process” to enter are getting “due process” when detained, then the deputy statement is not contradictory.
What are you talking about?
Do you legitimately think that because one person didn't get the worst possible result, no one does?
If you heard someone drove drunk without getting a DUI, would you suddenly start telling everyone no one can get a DUI and driving drunk is safe because that one drunk didn't cause an accident?