Every industry is full of technical hills that people plant their flag on. What is yours?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

How much of your income do you want to give to buy alcohol for strangers? Would you donate a large amount of your money to an aid fund that spent 10%? 50%? 80%? on booze? What about meth? Guns? Nazi memorabilia? What it's only 5% on Nazi stuff, 95% on food?

I'm being a dick but they have a fair point in why people put caveats on aid. I'm a fan of UBI to some degree personally, because I think people as a rule should be trusted with making their own decisions, but I do like choosing where the value of labor goes too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    You might personally think it sucks, but it's how it rolls. I live in a country where social system payments are straight up monetary amounts. If you are eligible to receive aid, you receive it. How you manage your affairs is none of the government's business .

    There are caveats, such as the income management system, but for the most part that's actually opt-in and they're reviewing junking the entire concept as it was originally introduced very very badly by an administration that attempted to leverage vulnerable groups

    My taxpayer dollars go to support people doing their peopley things as they choose, as adults. And I'm actually ok with that. It's a safety net, not a leash. Poverty isn't a moral position

  • source
  • parent