you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

to be fair, anyone using a font for branding that requires an annual subscription, put themselves in that spot. I think the reasons would be technical in this case. But they're basically betting that $20k/y in a couple years couldn't pay for the efforts to replace it, and I think that's really risky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Monotype is functionally an international monopoly. More than Luxottica, but for many of the same reasons. If the small selection of open source fonts don’t do what a company needs, then their only option other than Monotype is to have a font created. Monotype owns almost everything font related. Companies, fonts, everything.

  • source
  • parent