▲ 124 ▼ Senate Committee to Challenge Auto-Safety Mandates That Hurt ‘Affordability’ | Republicans question value of automatic braking, rear-seat reminders (www.wsj.com) submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world 70 comments fedilink hide all child comments This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article The safety features are worth millions of crashes prevented and thousands of lives saved, making them remarkably cost-effective. Capping the luxury features and size of passenger vehicles would do a lot more to bring down costs than removing safety features.
[+] Devial@discuss.online 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FragrantGarden@lemmy.today -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) Oh great nanny, I'd be so dead and dangerous without you. Thank you for reminding us all how much we depend on you to save us from our own stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FragrantGarden@lemmy.today -1 points 8 months ago (1 child) Oh great nanny, I'd be so dead and dangerous without you. Thank you for reminding us all how much we depend on you to save us from our own stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Devial@discuss.online -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent