▲ 326 ▼ Peanut Allergies Have Plummeted in Children, Study Shows (www.nytimes.com) submitted 8 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SlicingBot@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago (3 children) No the above poster is right. Your wild guess is a wild guess and not based on the science which you could have googled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago They showed us in realtime where modern people like do their own research! It's extra stinky because it was freshly pulled out of their ass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago OP's making a guess, presenting an example of something weird we hadn't considered. Fair play. Y'all are far too literal in your reading skills. permalink fedilink source parent [+] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone -24 points 8 months ago (2 children) You should know what the concept of science is before you go using the word like your sacrificial cow. Google is one of the most anti scientific institutions on earth. You should never believe anything you read from Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 months ago It's literally in the sub headline of the linked article Doctors have long recommended that infants avoid peanut products. But in 2017, experts officially reversed that guidance, and food allergies decreased sharply. I have no idea where you came up with what you posted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago (2 children) Google can directly lead you to the original sources and studies that have made these conclusions, dumb-dumb. They're not saying to blindly listen to the AI overview, they're saying to Google it and find the scientific studies that are publicly accessible instead of making wild guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Especially if you click on links that arent just the first 2 pages of sponsored content. Cory Doctorow, who knows a thing or 2 about this, used kagi as his search engine(or did for a while) and says it uses google without a bunch of garbage results(though it also doesn't exclusively use google for it's results) permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago Google intentionally tries to steer you towards corporate and government supported narratives. Most of their algorithm is designed to brainwash midwits who think a scientific study = truth, which wasn't even remotely true in the times before massive ngos and nonprofits and advocacy groups funding pseudoscientific studies. Reading a study these days doesn't really mean anything if you aren't an expert in the field. Most studies are also not reproducible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago They showed us in realtime where modern people like do their own research! It's extra stinky because it was freshly pulled out of their ass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago OP's making a guess, presenting an example of something weird we hadn't considered. Fair play. Y'all are far too literal in your reading skills. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone -24 points 8 months ago (2 children) You should know what the concept of science is before you go using the word like your sacrificial cow. Google is one of the most anti scientific institutions on earth. You should never believe anything you read from Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 months ago It's literally in the sub headline of the linked article Doctors have long recommended that infants avoid peanut products. But in 2017, experts officially reversed that guidance, and food allergies decreased sharply. I have no idea where you came up with what you posted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago (2 children) Google can directly lead you to the original sources and studies that have made these conclusions, dumb-dumb. They're not saying to blindly listen to the AI overview, they're saying to Google it and find the scientific studies that are publicly accessible instead of making wild guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Especially if you click on links that arent just the first 2 pages of sponsored content. Cory Doctorow, who knows a thing or 2 about this, used kagi as his search engine(or did for a while) and says it uses google without a bunch of garbage results(though it also doesn't exclusively use google for it's results) permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago Google intentionally tries to steer you towards corporate and government supported narratives. Most of their algorithm is designed to brainwash midwits who think a scientific study = truth, which wasn't even remotely true in the times before massive ngos and nonprofits and advocacy groups funding pseudoscientific studies. Reading a study these days doesn't really mean anything if you aren't an expert in the field. Most studies are also not reproducible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 months ago It's literally in the sub headline of the linked article Doctors have long recommended that infants avoid peanut products. But in 2017, experts officially reversed that guidance, and food allergies decreased sharply. I have no idea where you came up with what you posted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago (2 children) Google can directly lead you to the original sources and studies that have made these conclusions, dumb-dumb. They're not saying to blindly listen to the AI overview, they're saying to Google it and find the scientific studies that are publicly accessible instead of making wild guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Especially if you click on links that arent just the first 2 pages of sponsored content. Cory Doctorow, who knows a thing or 2 about this, used kagi as his search engine(or did for a while) and says it uses google without a bunch of garbage results(though it also doesn't exclusively use google for it's results) permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago Google intentionally tries to steer you towards corporate and government supported narratives. Most of their algorithm is designed to brainwash midwits who think a scientific study = truth, which wasn't even remotely true in the times before massive ngos and nonprofits and advocacy groups funding pseudoscientific studies. Reading a study these days doesn't really mean anything if you aren't an expert in the field. Most studies are also not reproducible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago Especially if you click on links that arent just the first 2 pages of sponsored content. Cory Doctorow, who knows a thing or 2 about this, used kagi as his search engine(or did for a while) and says it uses google without a bunch of garbage results(though it also doesn't exclusively use google for it's results) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 months ago Google intentionally tries to steer you towards corporate and government supported narratives. Most of their algorithm is designed to brainwash midwits who think a scientific study = truth, which wasn't even remotely true in the times before massive ngos and nonprofits and advocacy groups funding pseudoscientific studies. Reading a study these days doesn't really mean anything if you aren't an expert in the field. Most studies are also not reproducible. permalink fedilink source parent