128
Firefox 147 Will Support The XDG Base Directory Specification (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

In practice that should mean running mv ~/.mozilla ~/.config/mozilla.
Of course the old directory will still be detected and used if present, probably for a long time to come.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    they are not following the spec if this is the solution.

    • data files (like extensions, sessions, etc) need to go in XDG_DATA_HOME.

    • config files (user preferences) need to go in XDG_CONFIG_HOME.

    • cache files need to go in XDG_CACHE_HOME.

    • log files need to go in XDG_STATE_HOME.

    also hopefully they do check the variables and not just hardcoded ~/.config, ~/.local/share, etc

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think they mostly are.
    Cache is already in .cache/mozilla, so usually there is no change hence I didn't mention it. They did move the cache to the XDG_CACHE_HOME by default. And yes they are using the XDG variables including the recommended fallback values.

    The line between data and config has always been blurred, Most data in the browser is "data" until a user overrides it. Even extension files presence is linked with their configured state of being installed.
    For log files I'm not sure anyone follows that. Besides firefox barely has any plain logs, I think having those in the profile is fine.
    Currently it's all in XDG_CONFIG_HOME

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Always good to know that after sitting on it for 2 decades, shipping some half-assed shit was the best they could do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    The implications would be massive and I do not think most power users would benefit from it being broken up like that. Being able to backup or sync your entire Firefox profile by copying one directory is quite useful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent