In August 2025, two nearly identical lawsuits were filed: one against United (in San Francisco federal court) and one against Delta Air Lines (in Brooklyn federal court). They claim that each airline sold more than one million “window seats” on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321, many of which are next to blank fuselage walls rather than windows.

Passengers say they paid seat-selection fees (commonly $30 to $100+) expecting a view, sunlight, or the comfort of a genuine window seat — and say they would not have booked or paid extra had they known the seat lacked a window.

As reported by Reuters, United’s filing argues that it never promised a view when it used the label “window” for a seat. According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall, not a guarantee of an exterior view.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 9 months ago (1 child)

Reminiscent of the lawsuit about pints of beer being less than a pint. Bars argued it was a style of glass and not a unit of volume.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    This one is infuriating. It's a legal measurement here, and when they go out and test in major cities the failure rate is very high.

    A lot of places have switched to glass or sleeve though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments