▲ 156 ▼ Jack Dorsey funds diVine, a Vine reboot that includes Vine's video archive (techcrunch.com) submitted 9 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip [M] to c/technology@lemmy.zip 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments Jack Dorsey backs diVine, a Vine reboot that includes Vine's video archive of 6-second, looping videos.
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) this was discussed elsewhere. nostr is tightly coupled to lightning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 0 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I have never put a lightning address on my current nostr profile. I spend hours a day on nostr and people only comment on me being "unzappable" (untippable) a few times a month But are you saying you'd quit piefed if they added a built in wallet for every user? For me it would depend how it works Either way I thought we were discussing the rhetorical question about "crypto powered social media." That seemed like a totally fair way to save time getting clarification, instead of explaining the whole issue with the vagueness permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) nostr has a pretty bad reputation due to the nature of the protocol's inception and the people involved. any time that specific network is brought up, the discussion pivots. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago I agree on those points at least permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 0 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I have never put a lightning address on my current nostr profile. I spend hours a day on nostr and people only comment on me being "unzappable" (untippable) a few times a month But are you saying you'd quit piefed if they added a built in wallet for every user? For me it would depend how it works Either way I thought we were discussing the rhetorical question about "crypto powered social media." That seemed like a totally fair way to save time getting clarification, instead of explaining the whole issue with the vagueness permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) nostr has a pretty bad reputation due to the nature of the protocol's inception and the people involved. any time that specific network is brought up, the discussion pivots. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago I agree on those points at least permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) nostr has a pretty bad reputation due to the nature of the protocol's inception and the people involved. any time that specific network is brought up, the discussion pivots. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago I agree on those points at least permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iloveDigit@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago I agree on those points at least permalink fedilink source parent