▲ 801 ▼ Schrödinger's marriage rule (discuss.online) submitted 9 months ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago Right? I thought it was a sort of self-defence against being swindled, lied to, or otherwise taken advantage of by malicious thought patterns. Trying to use reason to communicate - especially with others who don't share your commitment to reason - is insane. permalink fedilink source parent