you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

I got curious and will attempt some math and duckduckgoing.

A forest can remove between 4.5 and 40.7 tons of Carbon Dioxide per year per hectare during the first 20 years of tree growth. Sauce

Humanity is currently generating around 40 billion tons of CO2 per year. Sauce

So now some simple math: it would take between 1 billion and 10 billion hectares of forests, depending on their maturity, to keep up. 100 hectare = 1 km^2^ sauce, so this means 10 to 100 million km^2^ of forests.

Earth's total surface area is 510 million km^2^. sauce.

Of that, here's a quick breakdown:

Sauce

So 10ish percent of the 510 million km^2^ of land on earth, or around 5.1 million km^2^ is a good candidate for tree planting. That's not enough if we want to sequester all the carbon produced by humanity. Without getting to net zero global warming will continue. The best we can do is slow it down. More disconcertingly, our appetite for energy is only increasing. The good news is that we're really starting to see large scale wind and farm operations ramping up, but there are still a lot of power plants scheduled to come online in the next two decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    yeah, sure, but have any of the other carbon sequestration technologies proven more efficient while being equally scalable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Technologies? No. But the oceans are 42x better at sequestering carbon than the surface, and there are some pretty interesting ideas around promoting phytoplankton blooms and kicking the ocean currents up, that sort of thing.

    But trees are rad. We should absolutely have more of them. Besides, they're proven, as you noted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    But really, humans have to stop emitting as much CO2eq. That's it. There is no magic sciencey solution.

    For a starts, we need to shut down all coal mines and power factories, stop oil, reduce animal exploitation as much as possible, stop fast fashion and reduce AI to scientific uses.

    Nothing here is new or controversial, it's just a bit boring, difficult, and goes against massive entrenched interests. That's the hard part.

    But any approach that is banking on technological breakthroughs maybe helping us capture all the CO2 (and methane, and nitrous oxide, and…) is inane.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments