▲ 147 ▼ Counter-Strike 2 System Requirements for Linux (i.imgur.com) submitted 2 years ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml [S] 25 points 2 years ago* (2 children) rn downloading and its 33.3GB + 1.7GB shader cache permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] phx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Bought include both storage for downloaded compressed archives and then to unpack before deleting them? I've run into this when updating games where I have the game installed and enough space for the update but not enough for that middle ground when it's getting unpacked permalink fedilink source parent [–] deus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) That's much more reasonable, I don't even have 85GB available. Why would they recommend that much storage? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cheeki@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe a dev just right click propertied their folder and typed that in haha. I think it's probably downloaded and cached community content. Unless it's a hint at new danger zone stuff permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jontique@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago My guess is that the shown number is the storage requirements when they add the war games maps and Danger Zone maps permalink fedilink source parent [–] Granixo@feddit.cl 2 points 2 years ago My guess is future proofing. AKA Subtly forcing users to buy more storage real state 💾💵 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Bought include both storage for downloaded compressed archives and then to unpack before deleting them? I've run into this when updating games where I have the game installed and enough space for the update but not enough for that middle ground when it's getting unpacked permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) That's much more reasonable, I don't even have 85GB available. Why would they recommend that much storage? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cheeki@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe a dev just right click propertied their folder and typed that in haha. I think it's probably downloaded and cached community content. Unless it's a hint at new danger zone stuff permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jontique@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago My guess is that the shown number is the storage requirements when they add the war games maps and Danger Zone maps permalink fedilink source parent [–] Granixo@feddit.cl 2 points 2 years ago My guess is future proofing. AKA Subtly forcing users to buy more storage real state 💾💵 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cheeki@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe a dev just right click propertied their folder and typed that in haha. I think it's probably downloaded and cached community content. Unless it's a hint at new danger zone stuff permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jontique@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago My guess is that the shown number is the storage requirements when they add the war games maps and Danger Zone maps permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jontique@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago My guess is that the shown number is the storage requirements when they add the war games maps and Danger Zone maps permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 2 points 2 years ago My guess is future proofing. AKA Subtly forcing users to buy more storage real state 💾💵 permalink fedilink source parent
