For months, investigators would have to wait to issue subpoenas or interview witnesses to gather new information,” the authors write, adding that Garland “had chosen to impose a very conservative interpretation of what DOJ officials called the 60-day rule,” urging prosecutors to avoid taking public investigative steps within two months of Election Day that involve candidates in that election.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

Yes. Some of the projects had gotten funded and started before Trump took office.

The laws you referenced has still been dismantled.

If you think the personal benefits from them outweigh the harm from not arresting an insurrectionist… I got nothing.

The fact is, Trump is destroying America and Biden did nothing to stop it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I mean Garland was a major problem, but sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Who nominated Garland to USAG? to whom did he answer to?

    you act like Biden had no power in that relationship. Garland's job was to ride herd on the DOJ. Biden's job (as far as this matter goes,) was to ride herd on Garland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments