For months, investigators would have to wait to issue subpoenas or interview witnesses to gather new information,” the authors write, adding that Garland “had chosen to impose a very conservative interpretation of what DOJ officials called the 60-day rule,” urging prosecutors to avoid taking public investigative steps within two months of Election Day that involve candidates in that election.
I kind of half get the concept, they don't want the precident to be say... if you are afraid of losing the election to an incumbent, send the FBI to raid their house. Publicly announce you are looking for child pornography and claim you'll announce the results after the election.
Something that whether trump runs again or not, and if there's another election is almost certainly going to happen (to protect the election for whoever is going to protect trump from his crimes after his presidency, whether that's trump, vance, one of his kids or whatever).
Same time there was fricking obvious cases here. It's not like fishing expeditions like trumps launching at his political opponents right now. and to top it off it doesn't even matter again because moderates are so worried about setting a precident that the other side can use to justify their horrific actions, without realizing that the extremists, don't give any fucks about precident. They'll cite it when they have it, but if they don't have it they will just steamroll ahead anyway.