3
which languages have a REPL and Type Annotation? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/programming_languages@programming.dev
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(as an interested university student:) From Programming at a small scale in Javascript and Logo¹, I have gathered that not knowing what type something is can be annoying. They also have REPLs, which is pretty nice. From various blog posts and debugging Rust programs, I have learned that not having a REPL can be annoying. Are there languages that have both?

(¹ Logo is a "lisp" with omitable parentheses, where these also don't define runtime-mutable s-expressions, lists are in brackets, and also Logo doesn't have structs, giving it bad maintainability outside of not having Type Annotation too)

Candidates

  • C# : Does it have a repl?
  • Java in BlueJ somehow
  • sometimes people just put Lisp or Lua in their C/Rust++ program (emacs, shenzhen I/O(game)), this accomplishes a similar task of making some debugging or scripting code faster to compile/interpret, but slower to run
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

They have different sets of tradeoffs and prioritize different things. Nevertheless, you can express typeclasses with the module system just as you can express the module system with typeclasses (using modern Haskell language extensions to the typeclass system). One is not more expressive than the other. You give me any usage of the module system, and I can show you how it can be done with typeclasses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Hah, I was afraid you would say that when I wrote my comment. I don't mean expressive in the sense of "can encode X"; I mean expressive in the sense of "can nicely encode X". The bullshit you have to put yourself through in Haskell to get the core niceties of modules is unpalatable (to me, anyway).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    You likely aren't familiar with modern Haskell, tbh. Things have changed a lot in the last handful of years. If you give me an example, I can show you how it can be done pretty reasonably (I write Haskell professionally, fwiw).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent