▲ 5 ▼ AI and the age of probabilistic programming (www.abrahammarinperez.com) submitted 9 months ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 16 points 9 months ago* (1 child) Am I too dumb or is this some LLM gibberish that has nothing to do with probablistic programming... permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child) Edit: Looks like the tool I linked is total bogus. I've copied the text and put it into a tool that tries to find out if its written by an Ai (using an Ai model themselves off course, the irony). Here is one such: https://stealthwriter.ai/ > About 66% of the content is likely human-written, while 34% appears AI-generated. The tool also has the ability trying to obfuscate or rewrite passages that should avoid being detected by such a tool themselves. So it is possible this article was written by an Ai model, a tool to obfuscate was used and them maybe a human edited and rephrased stuff. I can imagine this being part of the publishing process. Complete assumption by me here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) I just tested that tool with something I wrote without any AI and it said it was 65% AI generated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago Yeah, looks like this tool is bullshit too. I have similar results with my own written text too. I will edit my text and stop posting about this tool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child) Edit: Looks like the tool I linked is total bogus. I've copied the text and put it into a tool that tries to find out if its written by an Ai (using an Ai model themselves off course, the irony). Here is one such: https://stealthwriter.ai/ > About 66% of the content is likely human-written, while 34% appears AI-generated. The tool also has the ability trying to obfuscate or rewrite passages that should avoid being detected by such a tool themselves. So it is possible this article was written by an Ai model, a tool to obfuscate was used and them maybe a human edited and rephrased stuff. I can imagine this being part of the publishing process. Complete assumption by me here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) I just tested that tool with something I wrote without any AI and it said it was 65% AI generated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago Yeah, looks like this tool is bullshit too. I have similar results with my own written text too. I will edit my text and stop posting about this tool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 child) I just tested that tool with something I wrote without any AI and it said it was 65% AI generated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago Yeah, looks like this tool is bullshit too. I have similar results with my own written text too. I will edit my text and stop posting about this tool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago Yeah, looks like this tool is bullshit too. I have similar results with my own written text too. I will edit my text and stop posting about this tool. permalink fedilink source parent