Tons of liberals would never vote for a Marxist

The fun thing about intersectionality is that you could also look at her as the first latina candidate

But looking at what her politics are is somehow never the consideration. In terms of platform, she could hardly be more distinct from either Clinton or Kamala. I like the odds of popular socialist policies much, much better than focus-group tested middling capitalist policies.

Yea, it wasn’t the support for genocide or the fact that she was running around with Liz Cheney for a lot of the campaign. Nope, it was all because she was a woman.

Be serious.

Obama was charismatic. Clinton and Harris were not. That's the killer difference between them, not that "black/Muslim" was somehow an easier demographic to sell than "woman".

I think having an authentic populist voice is more important than any race or gender considerations. We simply don’t have another candidate that can do this as credibly as AOC. I think if she runs, in the primary, she’ll handily beat out Newsom, Pritzker or any other white guys in the party who are in a position to run.

Yes!? Clinton was the worst possible candidate for that election and Harris just isn't a good politician and was utterly sabotaged from Biden among other things waiting waaaaay too long to drop out.

Running a milqtoast centrist is just fascism with extra steps. They will do nothing of substance and then people will vote for fascists to enact change.

We tried neoliberal. We tried neoliberal. Can we really risk it when fascism is the consequence?

Notice how you only focus on a single one of their shared characteristics to say it's too risky?

Seriously. A bland corporate candidate who gave the opposition two decades of lead time to build up an opposition strategy. One of the worst candidates to have run of all time.