558
Running AI is so expensive that Amazon will probably charge you to use Alexa in future, says outgoing exec (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
175 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Running AI is so expensive that Amazon will probably charge you to use Alexa in future, says outgoing exec::In an interview with Bloomberg, Dave Limp said that he "absolutely" believes that Amazon will soon start charging a subscription fee for Alexa

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Yes, but so much more. An actually useful assistant that could draft emails, set reminders appropriately, create automations, etc. would be worth A LOT of money to me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think if there ends up actually being a version of AI that is privacy focused and isn't screwing over creators it'd be so much less controversial. Also, everyone (including me) is really, really fucking sick of hearing about it all of the time in the same way that everyone is/was sick of hearing about the blockchain. As in: "Bro your taco stand needs AI/the blockchain."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    You wouldn't need any kind of special training for this. Just the ability to do simple things like make calendar appointments, draft emails/responses, and set reminders based on time/locations/etc. It really doesn't seem very complicated but as far as I know no one has figured out how to do it yet. All the existing "assistants" are so bad that I don't even bother trying to use them anymore. They can't even do something simple like turning on a light with any degree of reliability.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent