So I am trying to say that very rarely did any of those people get super excited about Hilary Clinton, Seth Rich, American partisan politics, particular pundits on cable news, all kinds of stuff like that. They just weren’t interested. This lady has the most bizarre combination of election cheerleading like a CNN anchor, coupled with total disdain for the entire American foreign policy from top to bottom.

So you're saying that she doesn't remind you of the people you personally know, so she must be an evil foreign agent. That checks out, you do indeed seem to be a jingoistic chauvinist.

This lady I’m a lot less sure of, for reasons that should be equally obvious but seem like they keep eluding you.

No, the reasons are very obvious: you don't like her arguments, so you're smearing her with McCarthyist ad-hominems.

That’s actually not true.

It's as true as you're claims about Johnstone.

One of my common refrains is that the West is constantly betraying the Ukrainian people by giving intermittent and minimal aid and then putting extensive restrictions on what the Ukrainians are allowed to do with it, while they’re fighting for their lives

Wow, Russian talking points. Clearly you work for the KGB. Now address that I said you are using Hamas talking points in your history, clearly meaning you are a Hamas agent.

I mean she literally said very explicitly at

Ok, so she didn't say "Russia’s the good guys". Once again you are just openly making up fake quotes to spread disinformation.

I didn’t bookmark it or anything but it is there,

Oh, you mean like that last thing you said you hadn't book marked that you claimed she said, and then it turned out she hadn't?

She regards them in general as behaving reasonably in the war and the West as behaving unreasonably

Oh, did she say that? Oh, no, of course not, you're just once again making up a false thing to claim about her that she never said. More disinformation from you, CIA agent.

“AOC / Bernie are the bad guys” than

Damn, you just cannot stop making up false quotes.

Well your post history is all "Ukraine and the DNC are perfect and beyond criticism, and all Russians should be killed," so clearly you're CIA

Hamas doesn’t really have an extensively documented history of paying Western media people large and small to publicize various false things they want to plant in public consciousness

Yes they do, according to their enemies. Are you saying that Hamas don't pay media people? By the way, what actually false things has she said? Because so far you haven't actually been able to list any claims of fact that you believe are false.

and she’s not saying anything that is wildly false about Palestine that would even get me thinking in that direction.

Uhuh. So you're just admixing that it comes down to whether you personally agree with it or not. If you don't agree with it: Talking Point, clearly a paid foreign agent. If you do agree with it: It's just true. Just literally asserting that you're right, and disagreement is treason.

I’m not even sure what the equivalent would be for Hamas.

Why not? You've already said what makes something a Russian talking point: Anything that Russia is also saying, or anything that would benefit Russia if it was true. So saying, for example, that Israel is doing a genocide is, by definition, a Hamas talking point.

But they’re not really analogous organizations or situations.

Yeah, because you agree with one and not the other. That's literally the only difference you've been able to articulate: "disagree with me? Foreign agent!"

I’m aware that you’re pretending that the only reason I am saying any of this is because she has a viewpoint I “don’t agree with” or w/e.

I'm not pretending anything; that's the position you've laid out, you literally have not laid out any reason for you claim other than that she says things you disagree with. You just don't like me wording it that way because you want to be able to keep indulging in McCarthyist conspiracy theory to dismiss people you disagree with.

I feel like I’ve documented why I think it probably in a decent amount of detail at this point.

Oh yeah, you've definitely documented a bunch of things you disagree with her one; granted, a lot of those were completely made up lies that she never said, but that only further shows that you call her a ruskie infiltrator because you disagree with her.

Anything else you want me to answer before we wrap this up

Yeah, what do you think the end result of even the American left descending into warmed over Judeo-Bolshivik conspiracy theory is? What do you think the political environment will be like now that "You criticized the politician I like! Clearly you're an evil Ruskie subversive!" becomes the norm across the entire political spectrum?

Oh, and why do you have so many Hamas talking points in your history? Are you a Hamas agent?

Don’t get me wrong, you’ve been a peach, I just have to wash my cardboard box collection soon and I really don’t want to keep putting it off.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.” ― Jean-Paul Sartre