▲ 66 ▼ In 2023 which would you choose for a Linux phone and why: Phosh oder GNOME Shell mobile? (feddit.de) submitted 2 years ago by nils@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yup. Or Waydroid (or others) mature like Wine/Proton has. SafetyNet is an issue though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nils@feddit.de [S] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) SafetyNet is also an issue on Android as soon as you modify anything or install a custom ROM :/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I hate how corporations name their lock-in bullshit names that make it sound like it's for the user's protection when it's just protecting their garbage monopolies. I'd argue an open platform not under Google's control is more secure and safer for my data than a Google spy machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quackdoc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago while typically I would agree, safetynet actually does do a lot to provide a safe execution environment. Yes, it can be used for vendor lock-in BS and drm, however it does also get used to protect privileged apps like banking apps, secure email etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nils@feddit.de [S] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) SafetyNet is also an issue on Android as soon as you modify anything or install a custom ROM :/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I hate how corporations name their lock-in bullshit names that make it sound like it's for the user's protection when it's just protecting their garbage monopolies. I'd argue an open platform not under Google's control is more secure and safer for my data than a Google spy machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quackdoc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago while typically I would agree, safetynet actually does do a lot to provide a safe execution environment. Yes, it can be used for vendor lock-in BS and drm, however it does also get used to protect privileged apps like banking apps, secure email etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) I hate how corporations name their lock-in bullshit names that make it sound like it's for the user's protection when it's just protecting their garbage monopolies. I'd argue an open platform not under Google's control is more secure and safer for my data than a Google spy machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quackdoc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago while typically I would agree, safetynet actually does do a lot to provide a safe execution environment. Yes, it can be used for vendor lock-in BS and drm, however it does also get used to protect privileged apps like banking apps, secure email etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Quackdoc@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago while typically I would agree, safetynet actually does do a lot to provide a safe execution environment. Yes, it can be used for vendor lock-in BS and drm, however it does also get used to protect privileged apps like banking apps, secure email etc permalink fedilink source parent