▲ 802 ▼ I like the web app more. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Annoyed_Crabby@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml 498 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml -33 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] kogasa@programming.dev 21 points 3 years ago What a genuinely unhinged take. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Aiastarei@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago You're not paying for the API, you're paying for the dev time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] D_isforPaul@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago A slimeball for having an optional charge for a product they have made and have input their own time and skills into? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Forwhombagles@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* That's a hot take, it's still a shit take, but hot as well permalink fedilink source parent [–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Don't forget that he added ads into the app for a platform that doesn't have ads and then is selling the option to remove them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 3 years ago It's blowing my mind that people on here are happy to throw $100+ at a mobile app to access a free website that has multiple free and very good apps, especially when the app they're paying for is inserting ads into the experience to make people pay to remove the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 21 points 3 years ago What a genuinely unhinged take. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aiastarei@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago You're not paying for the API, you're paying for the dev time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] D_isforPaul@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago A slimeball for having an optional charge for a product they have made and have input their own time and skills into? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Forwhombagles@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* That's a hot take, it's still a shit take, but hot as well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Don't forget that he added ads into the app for a platform that doesn't have ads and then is selling the option to remove them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 3 years ago It's blowing my mind that people on here are happy to throw $100+ at a mobile app to access a free website that has multiple free and very good apps, especially when the app they're paying for is inserting ads into the experience to make people pay to remove the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 3 years ago It's blowing my mind that people on here are happy to throw $100+ at a mobile app to access a free website that has multiple free and very good apps, especially when the app they're paying for is inserting ads into the experience to make people pay to remove the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 3 years ago It's blowing my mind that people on here are happy to throw $100+ at a mobile app to access a free website that has multiple free and very good apps, especially when the app they're paying for is inserting ads into the experience to make people pay to remove the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
